In addition, during the history, a lot of artists' creations were so excellent and beyond the comprehension of most critics and as a result, many great works or even the artist who made them were rejected by people, mostly due to the misunderstanding and misleading criticism by most critics, and subsequently by the common individuals who were misled by those critics. UHistory is always replete with such examples. It was that a pity that Most of the novels of Franz Kafka, the famous European expressionistic writer, were not accepted by people until his death and it was also that a pity that Vincent van Gogh, one of the greatest three postimpressionistic painters, died without his paintings being appreciated by people. However, after the examination of history, both Kafka's novels and Gogh's paintings are regarded as high-level artworks by people all over the world today.
In summary, even though those critics might have done slightly contributions to the development of art, they are not the very persons that provide the society with something of lasting value. With the passage of time, critics' comments obtain increasingly less attention and people tend to remember only the artists rather than critics. After all, it is the artist who gives people something of eternal value.
