商家名称 | 信用等级 | 购买信息 | 订购本书 |
Dead Wake: The Last Crossing of the Lusitania | |||
Dead Wake: The Last Crossing of the Lusitania |
网友对Dead Wake: The Last Crossing of the Lusitania的评论
Erik Larson is not capable of writing anything less than a gripping account of history. All of his previous books have been spellbinding accounts of storms, cities, crimes, inventions, ships and/or war. In DEAD WAKE: The Last Crossing of the Lusitania, Larson returns to the subjects of war and ships and stirs in a potent mixture of international politics as well as a little romance to once again seduce his readers with a contemporary view of an historical situation.
Written to commemorate the 100th Anniversary of the sinking of the Lusitania, a Cunard passenger liner sunk by a German U-Boat, Larson's account differs in several ways from other well-known books produced on the subject. Diana Preston's LUSITANIA: An Epic Tragedy, published in 2002, is one of the best-written accounts of the disaster. The difference between Preston's work and Larson's might be found in the subtitle of the Larson book which emphasizes the crossing while Preston's book is most memorable for its account of the sinking and its aftermath, particularly accounts of survival. No one can read Preston's book without feeling as if he/she is clinging to a piece of wreckage in a cold, spring sea awaiting rescue. No one can read Larson's book and not feel like the proverbial fly on the wall in the infamous Room 40 of the British Admiralty. While Preston addressed Room 40, in Larson's writing, the room takes on a role and becomes a character (albeit not a very appealing one) in its own right.
Larson skillfully gets into the mindset of Winston Churchill and how determined he was to see America enter the war. In the States, Larson goes back in time and brings President Woodrow Wilson to life through a love affair that seemed to take up more of his time than thinking about the suitability of America's neutrality. Yet Larson allows readers to see Wilson in a most human light; perhaps the love affair gave him the strength for the decisions he had to make later. While the reader feels a connection with Wilson and also with the much-maligned but ultimately blameless Captain of the Lusitania, Captain Turner, utter horror and strong dislike is brought out when we read about Captain Schwieger of U-Boat 20 and, in a strange way, perhaps even more when we examine the real-life characters and goings-on within the Admiralty's Room 40. Germany and Britain both emerge as more than a bit despicable.
The pluses of Larson's latest work are his acute examination of Room 40, his up-close look at Woodrow Wilson, and his ability to swing between the behind-the-scenes action and balance his discoveries with a conventional but absorbing look at some of the passengers on board the Lusitania all while building a true and terrifying suspense in the narrative. His profile of Charles Lauriat, Boston bookseller and collector of rare documents and drawings, is excellent. One senses that Larson was truly interested in Lauriat and might, having not been faced with producing a book to coincide with the 100th anniversary of the Lusitania's sinking, have chosen Lauriat as a sole subject for a book or article.
Erik Larson can never disappoint. Whether one reads a great deal about WWI history, maritime disasters, or early 1900s international politics, there is something new to be learned in DEAD WAKE. For those who have read very little about the Lusitania, this book is an excellent starting point. As mentioned before, Diana Preston's LUSITANIA: An Epic Tragedy tells a similar story but with a slightly different approach. Both books have something to offer, but Larson's, being newer, may include some fresh revelations about the history we thought we knew.
The Lusitania is sunk by German U bait 20 and the US enters WWI almost exactly 2 years later.
So now that I have spoiled the ending for you, one can enjoy the journey. Unlike the Devil in the White City, this maritime disaster is well known and there are thousands if not millions of words speculating to the how and why. If one is looking for that, save your time and money, as this a book about the human side of the tragedy and the comedy of errors that led up to it. I am still dumbfounded by the callous attitude of British I telling cel and their zeal to protect their methods to sacrifice the lives of a thousand people on the altar of secrecy.. That in and of itself certainly diminishes the stature of Churchill in my opinion, which is really too bad. The fact that the problems in the British Admiralty would try to pin their callous poor decision making on the Captain of this doomed voyage, does nothing to engender any feeling but disgust for those men.
Okay polemic aside. The book is easy to read. The characters well illustrated. The book is a bit bogged down in detail to get started, but soon picks up the pace and becomes more of a tragic story, where this reader developed emotional attachments to many of the passengers on this final journey.
What could have been a boring retelling of a story told many times before was an enjoyable escape into a time and place far removed from today and well worth the time and effort I put into it,
Well written as a true thriller, and very engaging. While it very usefully challenges many of the historic myths about the sinking of the Lusitania, it stops short and leaves open questions which will not be asked by those not familiar with this era. The areas challenged very usefully by author Larson include: 1) The sinking was the cause of the US entrance into the war. 2) Great Britain's use of deception and manipulation.
The two big unchallenged questions in the commonly accepted history are: Should the US have ever entered the Great War? and secondly, Why?
These questions would lead an unconventional historian to another not yet told chapter of American history. The story of US Senator Robert LaFollette, who was virtually attacked for treason in his opposition to the war, in the first instance of US McCarthyite political with hunts, which began under Woodrow Wilson, around the war. And central to LaFollette's view, was the role of the British Empire in being the driving force behind the war. Telling the truth about LaFollette may still not answer the question of "Why?", but it would help to upend the idea that it was inevitable and justifiable for the US to join the war. And that final point was understood by the American people, who were then absolutely resistent to join another conflict, which was justifiable : World War II.
喜欢Dead Wake: The Last Crossing of the Lusitania请与您的朋友分享,由于版权原因,读书人网不提供图书下载服务