阅读部分需要提取的观点是：
- Main point: 有一副画上面的人物是简·奥斯汀
- Sub point 1: 这幅画得到了奥斯汀家族的认可
- Sub point 2: 面容同简·奥斯汀的另一幅画很像
- Sub point 3: 风格上看是奥扎厄斯·汉弗里的作品，此人活跃时期简·奥斯汀的年龄同画作相符
听力材料：
The evidence linking this portrait to Jane Austen is not at all convincing. Sure, the painting has long been somewhat loosely connected to Austen’s extended family and their descendents, but this hardly proves it’s a portrait of Jane Austen as a teenager. The reading’s arguments that the portrait is of Austen are questionable at best.
所有证明这幅画上人物是简·奥斯汀的证据都是不足信的。当然，这幅画长期以来同奥斯汀家族极其后代保持着某种意义上的联系。但是，这都不足以证明画中问人是少女简·奥斯汀。
First, when the portrait was authorized for use in the 1882 publication of her letters, Jane Austen had been dead for almost 70 years. So, the family members who asserted that the painting was Jane had never actually seen her themselves. They couldn’t have known for certain if the portrait was of Austen or not.
首先，当奥斯汀家族在1882年授权在她书信集中使用这幅肖像画的时候，简·奥斯汀已经过时差不多70年了。所以，声称画中人物是简·奥斯汀的家庭成员其实从来没有见过她本人。他们其实不能确信这幅画是不是奥斯汀。
Second, the portrait could very well be that of a relative of Austen’s, a fact that would explain the resemblance between its subject and that of Cassandra’s sketch. The extended Austen family was very large and many of Jane Austen’s female cousins were teenagers in the relevant period or had children who were teenagers. And some of these teenage girls could have resembled Jane Austen. In fact, many experts believe that the true subject of the portrait was one of those relatives, Marianne Kempian, who was a distant niece of Austen’s
第二，至于为什么这幅画上人物同卡桑德拉画的那副长得很像，可以解释为这幅上上的任务是简·奥斯汀的一个亲人。奥斯汀家族非常庞大，在画作成画时期，很多简·奥斯汀的堂姐妹还是十几岁的年纪，或者她堂姐妹的孩子是十几岁。这些女孩子们很多跟简·奥斯汀长得很像。事实上，很多专家认为这幅画中的人物实际上是这些人之一。她叫玛丽安· 凯佩恩，是简·奥斯汀的一个远方侄女。
Third, the painting has been attributed to Humphrey only because of the style. But other evidence points to a later date. A stamp on the back of the picture indicates that the blank canvas, you know the actual piece of cloth on which the picture was painted, was sold by a man named William Legg. Record showed that William Legg did not sell canvases in London when Jane Austen was a teenager. He only started selling canvases when she was 27 years old. So, it looks like the canvas was used for the painting at a time when Austen was clearly older than the girl in the portrait.
第三，认为这幅画是汉弗里作品的根据仅仅是风格。但是，有其他证据证明这幅画的成画时间实际要稍晚一些。画布背面的印章表明这幅画的空白画布是一个叫威廉姆·莱格卖出的。记录表明简·奥斯汀少女时期，威廉姆·莱格并没有在伦敦卖画布。他开始卖画布的时候，简·奥斯汀已经27岁了。所以，这幅画完成的时候，简·奥斯汀本人的年纪是大于画中人物的。
听力笔记内容：
Main point: 这幅画中人物不是简·奥斯汀
Sub point one: 虽有家族人的背书，但是这些人都没有见过简·奥斯汀本人
Sub point two: 同简·奥斯汀面容相似的原因可能是画中人物是简·奥斯汀的亲人
Sub point three: 画布背面的印章表明这幅画成画时，简·奥斯汀年龄大于画中人物问题
