首页 诗词 字典 板报 句子 名言 友答 励志 学校 网站地图
当前位置: 首页 > 教程频道 > 服务器 > 云计算 >

SolrCloud您值得拥有,性能表现良好

2013-03-10 
SolrCloud你值得拥有,性能表现良好转贴请声明原文: http://blog.csdn.net/duck_genuine/article/details/8

SolrCloud你值得拥有,性能表现良好

转贴请声明原文: http://blog.csdn.net/duck_genuine/article/details/8644412

solrCloud的压力测试:

上一篇文章提过使用solr3.6做的架构优化。solr 搜索架构优化

测试的时候还没有做更大数据量的并发请求压测试,最近来了新机器,比之前更加好,但没想要把索引放内存,而是放在ssd,内存是满 足的,但使用高于线上2倍多请求的时候,响应就没有之前那么良好,有下降的趋势,即使再加多8个core顶住 ,表现还是差差的。



先看一下非分多结点的测试数据:

4020832#50ms以下2735841 ,68.04%#50ms -100ms364699 ,9.07%#100ms -200ms401903 ,10.00%#200ms -300ms191195 ,4.76%#300ms -500ms156065 ,3.88%#500-1000139782 ,3.48%#1000-200020087 ,0.50%#2000-300011218 ,0.28%#3000-500041 ,0.00%#5000-以上1 ,0.00%


基于3.6.1设计的多结点测试数据:8结点*2 双备负载

响应时间1122万请求1184万  请求数983万请求#50ms以下9032936 ,80.44%9859400 ,83.25%8492507 ,86.39%#50ms -100ms730948 ,6.51%816640 ,6.90%566203 ,5.76%#100ms -200ms679844 ,6.05%751707 ,6.35%555547 ,5.65%#200ms -300ms218665 ,1.95%198764 ,1.68%129092 ,1.31%#300ms -500ms166813 ,1.49%104998 ,0.89%55841 ,0.57%#500-1000173188 ,1.54%52902 ,0.45%21114 ,0.21%#1000-200044532 ,0.40%11318 ,0.10%268 ,0.00%#2000-3000180387 ,1.61%42332 ,0.36%9754 ,0.10%#3000-5000923 ,0.01%3565 ,0.03%2 ,0.00%#5000-以上428 ,0.00%597 ,0.01%0 ,0.00%


加双倍压力测试,并且再多加4结点负载。总共是(8*3),负载看一下效果:


响应时间总量 1970万 =6985110  +6355850  +6362254#50ms以下13824099 ,70.16%4570760 ,65.44%4625922 ,72.78%4627417 ,72.73%#50ms -100ms1397816 ,7.09%595075 ,8.52%400213 ,6.30%402528 ,6.33%#100ms -200ms1433964 ,7.28%711878 ,10.19%360096 ,5.67%361990 ,5.69%#200ms -300ms655878 ,3.33%318562 ,4.56%169003 ,2.66%168313 ,2.65%#300ms -500ms764824 ,3.88%298421 ,4.27%232987 ,3.67%233416 ,3.67%#500-1000802516 ,4.07%261791 ,3.75%269960 ,4.25%270765 ,4.26%#1000-2000263937 ,1.34%148634 ,2.13%57885 ,0.91%57418 ,0.90%#2000-3000538667 ,2.73%74715 ,1.07%231570 ,3.64%232382 ,3.65%#3000-500021222 ,0.11%5274 ,0.08%8040 ,0.13%7908 ,0.12%#5000-以上285 ,0.00%0 ,0.00%170 ,0.00%115 ,0.00%


当然这其中还是可以再做优化,不过再看一下solrCloud请求表现:

同样是双倍的压力请求:但却只有8*2的结点负载。cpu表现稳定,且请求响应分值更佳,暂时只测试跑一会,没跑长时间的数据。取了阶段性的数据,依然保持90%是在100ms以下,而且没有看到几个机器负载彪高的趋势 .


响应时间256369326063452898226#50ms以下2168196 ,84.57%2207154 ,84.68%2449177 ,84.51%#50ms -100ms173866 ,6.78%175126 ,6.72%195621 ,6.75%#100ms -200ms167391 ,6.53%168675 ,6.47%190621 ,6.58%#200ms -300ms29169 ,1.14%29557 ,1.13%33537 ,1.16%#300ms -500ms10453 ,0.41%10755 ,0.41%12169 ,0.42%#500-10007348 ,0.29%7592 ,0.29%8556 ,0.30%#1000-20001887 ,0.07%1947 ,0.07%2354 ,0.08%#2000-30005297 ,0.21%5450 ,0.21%6102 ,0.21%#3000-500086 ,0.00%89 ,0.00%89 ,0.00%#5000-以上0 ,0.00%0 ,0.00%0 ,0.00%


暂时还没有测试并行读写的时候的性能。



转贴请声明原文: http://blog.csdn.net/duck_genuine/article/details/8644412


热点排行