作文：
1。Reading: Many birds died at the night of New Year's Day in the town. It might be related to the fireworks. 3 reasons: 1. (好像是，記不清了)Birds died at the same time when the fireworks were set off. People found that birds fell down... blabla... 2. Birds weren't poisoned or (forget a 2nd reason), but people found injuries. So they must be injured by the impact the fireworks. 3. Most of the birds are red-winged blackbirds. They have weak night vision and seldom fly at night. Only when something unusual happened, like the firework, they fly at night.
Lecture: Disagree. 3 reasons: 1. There are actually two places where we find dead birds. One is in the town, and the other outside town, where there weren't fireworks. So fireworks couldn't be the reason for either case. 2. The birds were indeed injured, but there are other possible reasons, for example, they were pushed by the weird air pressure down to the ground. 3. In fact, red-winged blackbirds are the most common birds in this area, so it's natural that they were the most common victims.
2。When you are assigned an important presentation for work or school, you prefer to work on it right away so that you can work on it a little bit every day, or wait until you have a good idea about the presentation?
考生2回忆：
Section 1.Reading
第一篇
给了一张图片,是白令海峡区域,北美大陆与亚洲大陆接壤的地方,上方是Arctic Ocean,说的是白令海峡那个位置B开头的那一片区域在原来的自然地貌特征是有草地的(不然就是苔原气候,学过地理的应该懂,就是草甸什么的,也不算是灌木),文中出现了数次ice age时期(不过ice age有那么多个,交替出现,我记不到它有没有指名是哪一期的ice age),不过可以确认有一个偏后的段落不然就是题目出现明确的在the latest ice age时间的一个神马情况,好像是文章中出现的第二个学者的理论中的一部分(在文中最后两段).
回到正确的叙述顺序(不好意思请见谅我有点混乱的逻辑顺序)
第一段说了这个地方原来是怎么怎么样的啊,有证据可以表明啊,什么草啊之类的。
第二还是三段问了开头为什么要写这句话的功能题,答案要往前面一段的最后一话找,是个疑问句,what is the historical还是什么之类的?反正意思是这个地方以前到底是什么样?在这个疑问句之前说科学家在神马问题上有分歧,这里有题,不过忘记了,实在是不好意。
然后介绍了两个人一个名字带C另一个不记得暂且用2号学者代替。这两个人的观点(或者是hypo)是不一样的.先说第一个人,他有三个证据来体现B地的自然地貌和物种组成,第一个忘记,第二个是cat-teeth animal(貌似是以F开头的5或6个letter以na结尾的动物),这里有题问为什么要提及这个动物?接下来第三个证据是wind有关，只有风大才可以吹走snow cover，which cannot be able to 搞定by 那个动物。我个人把刚刚那个cat-teeth题目的一个带wind的选项排除了,因为貌似没关系,我不记得那时候是怎么选的,我就是排除了.然后blahblah了好多，有什么这动物那动物的。
接着2号学者出现了，他认为不是这样的，因为也貌似有2-3个证据。中间位置出现了题目，问和C怎么不一样还是怎么的,反正就是contra了一下。
最后一段是complication，说的是现在已经有结论了，说两个人的都对了一部分，它们的证据的确可以支持他们的理论，有题。
