第2题:
A federal judge on Monday certified a $ 200 billion class action lawsuit against the tobacco industry for its marketing of light cigarettes.
Eastern District of New York Judge Jack B. Weinstein's 540-page opinion in Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. , 04-CIV-1945—which included an additional 965 pages of appendices for a total of 1,505 pages-gave tens of millions of smokers an avenue to recover damages from the nation's largest tobacco companies, including Philip Morris USA Inc. , R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , Lorillard Tobacco Co. , and Liggett Group, Inc.
The class will include anyone who purchased light cigarettes from the time tobacco companies began selling them in the 1970s. The judge said he even would consider broadening the class, to encompass smokers of all "low tar" brands, not just light cigarettes. The judge suggested that an expansion of the class could assist the parties in negotiating a global settlement. He set a trial date for January 22, 2007. The plaintiffs intend to seek treble damages.
Weinstein has expressed skepticism about the plaintiffs' theory of damages, which alleges that light smokers were defrauded of billions because they believed they were buying a product of greater value because of its health advantages. The judge also questioned the size of the class, as well as the claim that as many as 90 percent of light cigarette smokers chose the cigarettes because they were less harmful.
In his ruling Monday, the judge stressed that while the suit was far from perfect, the evidence was sufficient. He said the jury system—which he described as the "ultimate focus group of the law"—was well equipped to sort out the particulars in accordance with Amendment VII of the U. S. Constitution.
Weinstein declined to grant an interlocutory appeal to the 2nd U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Theodore M. Grossman of Jones Day in Cleveland, which represents R J. Reynolds, said the defendants would seek a stay and appeal the class certification under Rule 23 (f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
(1).From the passage it can be inferred that "a $ 200 billion class action lawsuit" is one that ______.
A. requires a public fund of $ 200 billion
B. may lead to US $ 200 billion in payment
C. involves an investment of US $ 200 billion
D. is about what the tobacco industry is worth
(2). From Paragraph 2, we know that the ruling of Judge Jack B. Weinstein has a total of ______ pages.
A. 540 B. 965 C. 1,505 D. 2,045
(3).From the beginning of the passage, we learn that Jack B. Weinstein most probably is ______.
A. a federal judge B. a New York lawyer
C. a report writer D. an Eastern District judge
(4).Obviously, the passage states that the lawsuit being briefed is between
A. Schwab and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
B. Jack B. Weinstein and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
C. tens of millions of smokers and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
D. any light cigarette smokers and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
(5). As mentioned in Paragraph 3, tobacco companies in the U. S. began marketing ______ in the 1970s.
A. high-class cigarettes B. low-class cigarettes
C. light cigarettes D. "low tar" brands
(6).The phrase "a global settlement" underlined in Paragraph 3 refers to ______.
A. smokers are found everywhere on the globe
B. smokers are to settle down around the world
C. people around the earth smoke light cigarettes
D. a final court decision that applies internationally
(7).The phrase "product of greater value" underlined in Paragraph 4 refers to ______.
A. lawsuit plaintiffs B. theoretical damages
C. light cigarettes D. health advantages
(8). The phrase "size of the class" underlined in Paragraph 4 refers to the ______.
A. number of light smokers B. quantity of light cigarettes
C. number of plaintiffs D. amount of money involved
(9). The word "particulars" underlined in Paragraph 5 refers to the ______.
A. lawsuit B. ruling C. evidence D. progress
(10).The phrase "Jones Day" underlined in Paragraph 6 refers to a ______.
A. person B. firm C. holiday D. corporation
