雅思写作如何飞越6奔向7分

 

 

 

近年来在中国大陆考区，雅思写作单项成绩的总平均接近5.5【半桶水】，这说明一般烤鸭的英文写作程度介于【modest user】与【competent user】之间。谢振礼老师个人认为问题不大，候选人只要针对【评分标准】来自行改进几点，【不出十日】，必能【越6向7】。

》细读【 Band 5 vs. Band 6】和 【Writing Target:  Band 9】相对比较。请网友注意【评分标准】的字里行间。首先把5.0写作的15个毛病挑出来。估计不出十日就能改进错误的三分之一，事后必然超越６分。假以10周，若能改进三分之二，则有信心７分在握。当然希望能把毛病全部消除，如此则９分有望，不过此事费时，必不下于10个月的煎熬，甚至近于10年的寒窗。
 
 
--没有写完。

 

--段落不清。

 

--只答部分。

 

--立场不明。

 

--没有结论。

 

--滥用连词。

 

--字汇贫乏。

 

--用字不当。

 

--言不对题。

 

--句型单调。

 

--用语不灵。

 

--标点随便。

 

--例证走题。

 

--缺乏逻辑。

 

--无复杂句。

 

 

【IELTS Band Scores】
 
9. expert user
8. very good user
7. good user
6. competent user
5. modest user
4. limited user
3. extremely limited user
2. intermittent user
1. non user
0. did not attempt the test

 
 
【雅思中国网】引用雅思官方的写作评分标准，节录【Band 5】【Band6】【band 9】

 

 >施展【主题】【内容】 Task Response
 
--【5】addresses the task only partially; the format my be inappropriate in places

*【6】addresses all parts of the task, although some parts may be more fully covered than others
+【9】fully addresses all parts of the work
 
--【5】expresses a position but the development is not always clear and there may be no conclusions drawn

*【6】presents a relevant position although the conclusion may become unclear or repetive
+【9】presents a fully developed position in answer to the question
 
--【5】presents some main ideas but these are limited and not sufficiently developed; there may be irrelevant detail

*【6】presents relevant main ideas but some may be inadequately developed/unclear
+【9】with relevant, fully extended and well supported ideas
  
 
 
>【结构】逻辑连贯 Coherence and Cohesion
 
--【5】presents information with some organization but there may be a lack of overall progression
--          makes inadequate, inaccurate or overuse of cohesive devices

*【6】arranges information and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall progression

*          uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or sentences may be faulty or mechanical

*          may not always use referencing clearly or appropriately
+【9】uses cohesion in such a way that attracts no attention
 
--【5】may not write in paragraphs, or paragraphing may be inadequate

*【6】uses paragraphing, but not always logically
+【9】skillfully manages paragraphing
 
 
 
>使用【字汇】恰当 Lexical Response
 
--【5】uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is minimally adequate for the task

*【6】uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task

*          attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy
+【9】uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features;
 
--【5】may make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word formation that may cause some difficulty for the reader

*【6】makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation, but they do not impede communication
+【9】rare minor errors occur only as `slips'
 
 
 
>【用语】【用句】精确 Grammatical Range and accuracy
 
--【5】uses only a limited range of structures

*【6】uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms
+【9】uses a wide range of structures
 
--【5】attempts complex sentences but these tend to be less accurate than simple sentences

*【6】
+【9】with full flexibility and accuracy;
 
--【5】may make frequent grammatical errors and punctuation may be faulty; errors may cause some difficulty for the reader

*【6】makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication
+【9】rare minor errors occur only as 'slips'